OBJECTIVE: To determine body image disturbance and relationship satisfaction between obese and non-obese ple consisted of 100 participants. Data was collected through purposive sampling technique from different gyms and nutrient-clinics of Johar Town, Faisal Town and Model Town of Lahore city. Educated females having minimum education level of intermediate belonging to upper and middle-class families were recruited. The shortened form of Body Shape Questionnaire and Relationship Assessment Scale were administered, in addition to collecting demographic information through a semi structure performa. Independent sample t-test and Pearson’s Product-Moment Correlation was used in the analysis of the data, using SPSS v.21.RESULTS: Most of obese and non-obese married women (n=) were in the age range of 25-35 years and 30-40 years respectively with mean age of 34 years for obese and 33 years for non-obese married women. Husband’s mean age for obese and non-obese was 39 years and 38 years respectively. Almost all the non-obese (n=) while most of the obese (n=) married women were having education level of 16 or more while almost all the non-obese (n=) were working women and most (n=) of the obese were house wives. Thirty-two () non-obese were having 2-6 years while (n=) obese married women were having 7-9 years of marriage duration. A significant relationship was shown at the level of body image disturbance (p<0.000) and marital satisfaction (p<0.000) between obese and non-obese married women.CONCLUSION: Obesity has significant impact on body image and relationship satisfaction in married women.
Blog post Info
- ACM
- ACS
- APA
- ABNT
- Chi town
- Harvard
- IEEE
- MLA
- Turabian
Writers are allowed and you may motivated to article what they do online (elizabeth.grams., for the institutional repositories otherwise on their site) just before and you can within the distribution procedure, possible produce productive transfers, and additionally earlier and you may greater citation of wrote functions.
References
Community Fitness Organization. Being obese and you may fat 2016. National Institute from Diabetic issues and Digestive and Renal Diseases. Fat and you may being obese statistics [Internet] 2012. Burkhauser Camper, Cawley J. Past Body mass index: the worth of far more specific steps away from fatness and you can being obese inside public research lookup. J Health Econ 2008;27(2):519-29. DOI: /j. Crowther Nj, Norris SA. The modern hips width reduce section employed for the new diagnosis out-of metabolic syndrome inside sub-Saharan African female is not suitable. PLoS One to 2012;7(11):e48883. DOI: /diary. Goswami S, Sachdeva S, Sachdeva Roentgen. Muscles image satisfaction certainly women college students. Ind Psychiatry J 2012;21(2):168-72. DOI: -53. Ng Meters, Fleming T, Robinson Yards, Thomson B, Graetz N, Margono C, ainsi que al. Around the globe, regional, and you can national frequency from fat and you may carrying excess fat in children and grownups while in the 1980-2013: a logical investigation for the Internationally Burden from Situation Studies 2013.
The brand new Lancet 2014 Will get 29;384(9945):766-81. DOI: /S0140-6736(14)60460-8. Jernigan Was, Tergas AI, Satin AJ, Fader An. Being obese administration from inside the gynecologic cancer survivors: seller means and you can attitudes. Have always been J Obstet Gynecol 20. Sallis JF, Owen N, Fische EB. Ecological different types of wellness behavior. In the Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K, writers. Health Behavior and you will Fitness Degree: Principle, Browse, and exercise. JOSSEY-Bass, good wiley imprint. John Wiley & Sons, San francisco bay area, United states. Bandura An effective. A personal intellectual theory away from identification. For the Pervin L, John O, writers. Manual away from personality. Guilford Guides, Ny, Usa. Sarwer DB, Lavery M, Spitzer JC. A review of brand new dating ranging from tall carrying excess fat, total well being, and you can intimate mode. Obes Surg 2012 Annual percentage rate;22(4):668-76. DOI: /sstep 11695-0step 12-0588-step 1. Paeratakul S, White MA, Williamson Weil, Ryan DH, Bray GA.
Intercourse, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic updates, and you will Body mass index in relation to care about?perception from obese. Obes Res 20. McNulty JK, Neff Los angeles, Karney BR. Past very first attraction: real appeal inside the newlywed Feb;22(1):135-43. DOI: -. Arcelus J, Yates A good, Whiteley Roentgen. Personal matchmaking, health-related and you will sandwich-medical food conditions: A review of the fresh literature. Intercourse Relation Ther 20. Stokes Roentgen. Frederick-Recascino C. Ladies’ perceived looks image relationships having personal joy. J Women Aging 2003;15(1):17-30. DOI:/J074v15n01_03. Zawawi JA. Dating ranging from Body mass index, Human body Picture Frustration and you can Psychological Distress among Gymnasium Lady Users for the Zarqa-Michael jordan. Int J Hum Soc Sci 2014;4(1):11-20. Evans C, Dolan B. Body shape survey: Derivation regarding reduced “alternative variations”. Int J Eat Disord 1993;13(3):315-21. DOI: -108X(199304)13:3 3. CO;2-step 3. Tips A great, Fidanza F, Karvonen MJ, Kimura N, Taylor HL.
Indices regarding cousin lbs and you will being obese. Int J Epidemiol 2014;43(3):655-65. DOI: /ije/dyu058. Hendrick SS. A general measure of dating satisfaction. J 1988;50(1):93-8. DOI:31. AL-Otaibi HH, Naseef SL, Raouf TA. Human anatomy picture disappointment, lbs status and you will exercise one of an example regarding university students for the Saudi Arabia. Dinner Nutr Sci 2013;4(6):616-25. DOI:/fns. Seligman MEP. Positive fitness. Appl Psychol 2008;57(1):3-18. DOI: /j. Yamamiya Y, Cash TF, Melnyk SE, Posavac, Hd, Posavac SS. Ladies’ contact with slim-and-stunning mass media pictures: Looks picture aftereffects of media-finest internalization and you will impression-cures interventions. Human anatomy Photo 2004;2(1):74-80. DOI:/j. Lovell GP, Gordon JA, Mueller MB, Mulgrew K, Sharman R. Fulfillment away from Earliest Psychological Need, Self-Determined Get it done Inspiration, and you may Emotional Well-In Parents Exercising in group-Founded As opposed to Individual-Founded Contexts. Healthcare Ladies Int 2016;37(5):568-82. DOI:333. O’Brien KS, Latner JD, Ebneter D, Huntsman JA.
Obesity discrimination: brand new character out of appearance, individual ideology, and anti-lbs bias. Int J Obes (Lond) 20. Give PG, Boersma H. While making sense of getting body weight: An excellent hermeneutic investigation away from adults’ factors to have obesity. Couns Psychother Res 2005;5(3):212-20. DOI: 1690500310429. Choo J, Jeon S, Lee J. Intercourse differences in health-associated standard of living for the abdominal carrying excess fat during the good Korean society. BMJ Unlock 20-003954. Bolton MA, Lobben We, Stern TA. Brand new impact out of muscles visualize with the patient proper care. Demure Proper care Mate J Clin Psychiatry 2010;12(2):722-34. DOI: /PCC. Meltzer AL, McNulty JK. Muscles visualize and relationship fulfillment: evidence into mediating character off sexual frequency and sexual joy. J Fam Psychol 2011 April 1;24(2):156-64. DOI: /a001906. Pujols Y, Close BN, Meston CM. This new relationship between sexual joy and the body image in women.
J Gender Med 2010;7(2 Pt 2):905-16. DOI:/j. Ludwig J, Sanbonmatsu L, Gennetian L, Adam Elizabeth, Duncan GJ, Katz LF, ainsi que al. Communities, being obese, and you can all forms of diabetes–good randomized personal experiment. Letter Eng J Med 2011 October 20;365(16):1509-19. DOI: /NEJMsa1103216. Williams K. Has the future of ination off applications gratuites de rencontres de niche sex, relationships, and you will emotional really-are. J Health Soc Behav 2014 May a dozen;44(4):470-87.