OBJECTIVE: To determine body image disturbance and relationship satisfaction between obese and non-obese ple consisted of 100 participants. Data was collected through purposive sampling technique from different gyms and nutrient-clinics of Johar Town, Faisal Town and Model Town of Lahore city. Educated females having minimum education level of intermediate belonging to upper and middle-class families were recruited. The shortened form of Body Shape Questionnaire and Relationship Assessment Scale were administered, in addition to collecting demographic information through a semi structure performa. Independent sample t-test and Pearson’s Product-Moment Correlation was used in the analysis of the data, using SPSS v.21.RESULTS: Most of obese and non-obese married women (n=) were in the age range of 25-35 years and 30-40 years respectively with mean age of 34 years for obese and 33 years for non-obese married women https://datingranking.net/pl/datehookup-recenzja/. Husband’s mean age for obese and non-obese was 39 years and 38 years respectively. Almost all the non-obese (n=) while most of the obese (n=) married women were having education level of 16 or more while almost all the non-obese (n=) were working women and most (n=) of the obese were house wives. Thirty-two () non-obese were having 2-6 years while (n=) obese married women were having 7-9 years of marriage duration. A significant relationship was shown at the level of body image disturbance (p<0.000) and marital satisfaction (p<0.000) between obese and non-obese married women.CONCLUSION: Obesity has significant impact on body image and relationship satisfaction in married women.
Blog post Information
- ACM
- ACS
- APA
- ABNT
- Chicago
- Harvard
- IEEE
- MLA
- Turabian
Authors are allowed and encouraged to article their work on the web (age.grams., within the organization repositories or on their site) just before and you may into the submitting techniques, as it can lead to effective exchanges, as well as prior to and greater solution away from authored works.
Records
Globe Health Business. Carrying excess fat and you may over weight 2016. Federal Institute out-of All forms of diabetes and Digestion and you may Kidney Diseases. Overweight and you will obesity analytics [Internet] 2012. Burkhauser Rv, Cawley J. Beyond Bmi: the value of a lot more particular procedures away from fatness and you can obesity for the public research research. J Fitness Econ 2008;27(2):519-30. DOI: /j. Crowther Nj, Norris SA. The modern sides circumference cut area useful for new medical diagnosis away from metabolic disorder inside the sub-Saharan African people is not appropriate. PLoS That 2012;7(11):e48883. DOI: /record. Goswami S, Sachdeva S, Sachdeva R. Human anatomy visualize fulfillment certainly lady people. Ind Psychiatry J 2012;21(2):168-72. DOI: -53. Ng M, Fleming T, Robinson Meters, Thomson B, Graetz N, Margono C, mais aussi al. Global, local, and you will national incidence away from fat and you may carrying excess fat in children and you may people through the 1980-2013: a systematic data into Worldwide Burden from Disease Studies 2013.
The Lancet 2014 May 29;384(9945):766-81. DOI: /S0140-6736(14)60460-8. Jernigan In the morning, Tergas AI, Silk AJ, Fader A keen. Obesity government within the gynecologic disease survivors: vendor means and you will perceptions. Are J Obstet Gynecol 20. Sallis JF, Owen Letter, Fische EB. Environmental type wellness behavior. Inside the Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K, publishers. Wellness Conclusion and you can Health Knowledge: Idea, Search, and practice. JOSSEY-Bass, a beneficial wiley imprint. John Wiley & Sons, Bay area, Us. Bandura An excellent. A social intellectual theory away from identity. For the Pervin L, John O, writers. Handbook off personality. Guilford E-books, New york, U . s .. Sarwer DB, Lavery M, Spitzer JC. A review of new relationship ranging from high obesity, well being, and you will intimate form. Obes Surg 2012 Annual percentage rate;22(4):668-76. DOI: /s1step one695-012-0588-1. Paeratakul S, Light MA, Williamson Da, Ryan DH, Bray GA.
Gender, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic reputation, and you can Bmi when considering notice?impact of obese. Obes Res 20. McNulty JK, Neff Los angeles, Karney BR. Beyond first attraction: bodily attractiveness for the newlywed Feb;22(1):135-43. DOI: -. Arcelus J, Yates A great, Whiteley R. Personal relationship, medical and you will sandwich-systematic food disorders: A glance at the new literature. Sex Loved ones Ther 20. Stokes Roentgen. Frederick-Recascino C. Ladies’ recognized human body visualize connections that have personal delight. J Female Ageing 2003;15(1):17-31. DOI:/J074v15n01_03. Zawawi JA. Matchmaking anywhere between Bmi, Muscles Image Disappointment and you will Emotional Worry certainly Gym People Pages inside the Zarqa-Jordan. Int J Hum Soc Sci 2014;4(1):11-20. Evans C, Dolan B. Figure survey: Derivation regarding reduced “alternate variations”. Int J Consume Disord 1993;13(3):315-21. DOI: -108X(199304)13:step three step 3. CO;2-step three. Tactics Good, Fidanza F, Karvonen MJ, Kimura Letter, Taylor HL.
Indices out-of cousin lbs and carrying excess fat. Int J Epidemiol 2014;43(3):655-65. DOI: /ije/dyu058. Hendrick SS. An universal measure of relationships fulfillment. J 1988;50(1):93-8. DOI:30. AL-Otaibi HH, Naseef SL, Raouf TA. Human anatomy photo dissatisfaction, lbs updates and you will physical activity certainly one of a sample out of students during the Saudi Arabia. Food Nutr Sci 2013;4(6):616-twenty five. DOI:/fns. Seligman MEP. Confident wellness. Appl Psychol 2008;57(1):3-18. DOI: /j. Yamamiya Y, Bucks TF, Melnyk SE, Posavac, High definition, Posavac SS. Women’s contact with narrow-and-stunning news photos: Human anatomy visualize negative effects of mass media-greatest internalization and effect-prevention interventions. Looks Visualize 2004;2(1):74-80. DOI:/j. Lovell GP, Gordon JA, Mueller MB, Mulgrew K, Sharman R. Satisfaction out-of Earliest Mental Requires, Self-Determined Take action Desire, and you will Psychological Better-In Mothers Exercising in group-Depending As opposed to Personal-Oriented Contexts. Healthcare Girls Int 2016;37(5):568-82. DOI:333. O’Brien KS, Latner JD, Ebneter D, Huntsman JA.
Carrying excess fat discrimination: the newest part off physical appearance, individual ideology, and you may anti-body weight prejudice. Int J Obes (Lond) 20. Grant PG, Boersma H. While making feeling of are weight: A great hermeneutic study out-of adults’ grounds getting carrying excess fat. Couns Psychother Res 2005;5(3):212-20. DOI: 1690500310429. Choo J, Jeon S, Lee J. Intercourse variations in health-related lifestyle for the intestinal carrying excess fat in a great Korean society. BMJ Unlock 20-003954. Bolton MA, Lobben We, Harsh TA. The feeling regarding looks visualize towards the patient care and attention. Prim Worry Partner J Clin Psychiatry 2010;12(2):722-34. DOI: /PCC. Meltzer AL, McNulty JK. Body image and you will marital fulfillment: evidence for the mediating part regarding intimate regularity and sexual joy. J Fam Psychol 2011 April 1;24(2):156-64. DOI: /a001906. Pujols Y, Secure BN, Meston CM. The brand new relationship ranging from sexual joy and body image in women.
J Sex Med 2010;7(dos Pt 2):905-sixteen. DOI:/j. Ludwig J, Sanbonmatsu L, Gennetian L, Adam Elizabeth, Duncan GJ, Katz LF, et al. Areas, obesity, and diabetes–a beneficial randomized personal check out. Letter Eng J Med 2011 October 20;365(16):1509-19. DOI: /NEJMsa1103216. Williams K. Contains the future of ination out-of intercourse, matrimony, and you can emotional better-becoming. J Fitness Soc Behav 2014 May twelve;44(4):470-87.