The fresh new engine problem is within the give of factory’s both motors had several problems but these are increasingly being overcome, Austro comes with the advantage of becoming some about Theilert and therefore features seen a few of the problems that Theilert have acquired, on the other hand this new Theilert system has more big date floating around (a lot of it within the UAV’s) and soon have been around in a position to give some of the maintenance things (brand new clutch change will be in the near future see 600 times).
The a great flights
Out-of a running perspective the new Thielert was a less tricky engine plus the pounds is much lower than the newest Austro, I’d say that new Theilert weight advantage balances the latest Austro energy advantage.
At present towards the engine situation I can look for zero clear advantage one-way or the most other between the two Deisel engines, the one thing I can say is that which have fuel costs rising these motors can be more appealing.
I’ve had an excellent DA40-180 (AVGAS N-reg) over the past a couple of years, so cannot help for 
the diesel functioning will cost you (in the event FYI, 133ktas in the 8.3gph 8,000ft, 140ktas within 9.0gph cuatro,000ft to the pricey AVGAS).
I have flown six-pack and you will G1000 and you may love the fresh G1000 – it is simply higher, specifically IFR (no matter if in addition to VFR it assists a lot which have situational sense so an instant seek advice from the fresh new map is perhaps all that’s needed, so fork out a lot a shorter time lead off considering a chart verifying where you are)
b) you certainly also want the GFC700 autopilot if you are going in order to travel IFR – regardless if do not know as much as possible make this for the DA40D (unclear when it is recognized inside EASA-land). I have flown along with other autopilots, although GFC700 was ways before other people I have tried – extremely an effective, is completely included to your G1000 and assists lightens workload whenever you really need it i.elizabeth. when the standards are bad (even yet in average-big turbulence, in which they flies most smoothly and you may really).
The actual only real issue with these two is the fact there clearly was too much to see – you ought to spend numerous big date with the simulator off Garmin.
9 period flying more two days, is less expensive than a good way towards the a good BA flight for every single seat. Extremely flights that have otherwise in place of G1000.
Yet not, i travel on fun and you can utility, whenever we flew on economy however imagine i would not!
This new jury has been from the Austro for the procedure when the cold inflight restart and what to do if for example the re also-begin fails, but that is an issue that may create a thread of the it’s mind
My own personal look at was it’s just not quite an equivalent bundle as the the big stop Us September methods, but is close, and you may if in case the new engine issues was indeed solved stands for excellent value for the money.
Cirrus, Mooney, TB20s to mention a few definitely give a more quickly even more able to bundle – albeit at a price and certainly having a much more expensive strength burn. New DA42 measures up with these alot more positively but leaving out the dual versus solitary discussion the still not likely quite a good a good.
The new DA42 injury nearly an identical fuel at the almost an equivalent sail speed because my TB20 i.elizabeth. 11 USG/hours at the 140kt IAS, although obviously into 42 this is the full fuel burn for both engines.
The brand new reliability circumstance appears to be boosting however, whether a private holder can look at the motor technology are “proven” following debacles off ages prior, try an individual have a look at. I want to look for some more years. All of the DA42 individual citizens I’m sure was basically extremely critical out-of Diamond’s management of the difficulties and you may wouldn’t believe the business so far as they could throw they.