Other covariates sensed provided every single day vitamin D and you can multivitamin supplement have fun with, yearly dental professional check out (annual or otherwise not), tooth-grooming regularity (two times a day or otherwise not), flossing regularity, years and you can gender.
Data were accessed and analyzed at the Research Data Centre (RDC) at the University of Manitoba using SPSS 20 (IBM, Armonk, NY), SAS 9.2 (SAS, Cary, NC), and Stata 13 MP (StataCorp LP, College Station, Tex.). As per RDC restrictions, original sample sizes were suppressed. Bootstrap weights for variance estimation and weighted results are presented with degrees of freedom fixed to 11. Descriptive statistics include means and frequencies with 95% confidence intervals (CI). ? 2 tests were used to determine the unadjusted correlation of each categorical independent variable with GI and LOA. Student t tests were used to determine the unadjusted correlation of each continuous independent variable with GI and LOA. Three multiple logistic regression models for GI and for LOA were developed to determine the adjusted association between 25(OH)D levels and GI and LOA, controlling for potential confounders. Model A used 25(OH)D concentration of < 50 nmol/L, model B used 25(OH)D concentration < 75 nmol/L, and model C used mean 25(OH)D concentration. Variables with a p value of ? 0.075 were included in the multiple logistic regression analysis for GI and LOA, with the exception of plasma vitamin D concentration and known risk factors for periodontal disease, such as smoking. A p value ? 0.05 was significant.
Overall performance
The mean 25(OH)D concentrations (95% CI) in the GI and LOA samples were 90.8 (77.5–104.2) and 85.6 (74.6–97.2) nmol/L, respectively. Although mean 25(OH)D levels were above the thresholds for vitamin D sufficiency, 63% of each sample had concentrations below the 75 nmol/L threshold and 25% of each population had 25(OH)D levels < 50 nmol/L.
Although not, whenever confounding parameters had been managed to have, several logistic regression data off GI (Table dos) showed that simply plaque and you can intercourse was significantly in the GI
Bivariate analysis of GI (Table 1) [Ed. Note: All Tables in this article are available in the PDF version]. showed that several variables were significantly associated with 25(OH)D concentrations below the thresholds for vitamin D sufficiency. Participants with 25(OH)D concentrations < 50 nmol/L and < 75 nmol/L had significantly increased odds of having more GI (odds ratio (OR) 1.63 and 1.44, respectively). Those taking vitamin D supplements had significantly lower odds for GI (OR 0.56), while those with diabetes had increased odds of having moderate to severe GI (OR 1.33). Mean BMI was significantly higher among those with the worst GI. Meanwhile, those who reported frequenting a dental professional ? 1 time a year, brushing their teeth twice daily and flossing daily had significantly lower odds for GI. Increased scores for plaque were associated with increased odds for moderate to severe GI. Males had increased odds for GI compared with females, while those in higher-income categories had lower odds for GI than those in lower-income categories.
Female had down odds of modest to help you really serious GI, while highest opinions to the plaque index enhanced the odds out of modest to serious GI. Zero extreme family relations ranging from twenty five(OH)D and you may GI try noticed in activities An excellent, B or C from the numerous logistic regression data of GI.
Multiple parameters were significant on the bivariate analysis off LOA (Desk step 3). Surprisingly, delivering a beneficial multivitamin or a nutritional D complement are with the enhanced likelihood of much more serious LOA. Highest mean HbA1c thinking was on the improved likelihood of a lot more big LOA because was HbA1c > 7%. Older ages are in the enhanced likelihood of more serious LOA, while a living off > $sixty 100 try from the all the way down odds of more serious LOA. No tall connection is actually discover between twenty five(OH)D accounts and LOA about bivariate investigation.