Coyne, J.C., and you can D.A good. Smith. 1994. People coping with myocardial infarction: Contextual perspective into diligent self-efficacy. Journal out of Nearest and dearest Psychology 8:1-thirteen.
Fincham, F.D., T.N. Bradbury, and you will C.K. Scott. 1990. Cognition in the and you can T. Letter. Bradbury, eds. The fresh mindset of matrimony. Ny: Guilford Push.
Gottman, J.Meters. 1993. The opportunities regarding disagreement involvement, escalation, and you will cures when you look at the relationship correspondence: A beneficial longitudinal view of five particular people. Record regarding Consulting and you will Medical Therapy 61(1):6-fifteen.
Gottman, J.Yards., S. Carrere, C. Swanson and you may J. Coan. 2000. Respond to “From preliminary research so you’re able to input.” Log of ily 62(1):265-273.
Gottman, J.M., J. Coan, S. Carrere, and you will C. Swanson. 1998. Forecasting relationship contentment and you will balance off newlywed interactions. Journal regarding ily 60(1):5-22.
Holtzworth-Munroe, A good., and you may Letter. S. Jacobson. 1985. Causal attributions out-of married people: Whenever carry out it seek explanations? Exactly what do it conclude after they manage? Diary out of Identity and you can Social Psychology -1412.
Kendall, S., and you may D. Tannen. 2001. Commentary and Sex. In the D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, and you will H. Hamilton, eds. The latest Handbook regarding Commentary Investigation. 548-567. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.
Lerner, H. 2002. The new dance off partnership: Ideas on how to talk to anyone if you’re furious, harm, frightened, crazy, insulted, betrayed otherwise desperate. Ny: HarperCollins Publishers.
https://datingranking.net/pl/bristlr-recenzja/
Stanley, S., T. Bradbury, and you will H. . Structural defects in the link of preliminary research on relationships to help you intervention to have people. Diary regarding ily 62(1):256-264.
Cite this particular article
Wiley, Angela Roentgen. 2007. Linking as the several: Correspondence experiences getting healthy matchmaking. The newest Discussion board getting Friends and you can User Things, a dozen (1).
An excellent telecommunications and you may condition-solving event is crucial for relationship profits; but not, match relationships wanted way more than a telecommunications and you will situation-solving skills. You will find a common more-reliance upon these given that “regal road to love and a surviving, delighted marriage”(Gottman and Silver 1999, 8). This type of enjoy are necessary not adequate to have strong relationships and you will might be contextualized included in the big couple system. (To have facts about other trick strategies to help you strengthening and you can keeping good healthy relationships, understand the National Extension Relationships and Relationships Degree Model,
Inside her publication, The latest Dance out-of Union, specialist Harriet Lerner (2002) talks about which have a real sound in important sexual dating. She contends one an essential part of experiencing a genuine sound was “publicly shar[ing] competence including trouble and you can vulnerability (Lerner 2002, 3). The girl a lot of time-term clinical behavior implies that its intimate communications entails people totally experiencing both and you may inquiring making clear issues that enable them to understand each other much deeper. Successfully sexual partners also are ready state their attitude and you can viewpoint, even though the individuals change from its partner’s.
Bad perceptions. Negative interpretation models commonly occur whenever lovers trust the newest bad rather of the best on the one another (Fincham, Bradbury, and you can Scott, 1990; Holtzworth-Munroe and you can Jacobson 1985). Such as for instance couples are definitely not “keeping they positive.” They might engage in a harsh initiate-upwards bid predicated on an awful translation or assumption. They could change against or of their mate when reacting so you can a quote. Lovers who are likely to bad perceptions might instead try entertaining a confident cause of the new other people’s behaviors and discussing these with its spouse. Particularly, unlike, “You probably did maybe not pull out the newest rubbish as you want to make me personally frustrated,” Jim you will say to their spouse, Peg, “I am certain you did not sign up for the new garbage since you consider I’d do have more to enhance the fresh can.”
Love, P
Coan, J., J. Gottman, J. Babcock, and you can Letter. Jacobson. 1997. Battering and the male rejection out of infiuence out of ladies. Competitive Behavior -388.