Original Analyses
For women (select Table dos), the two extremely depicted adult attachment appearances were safer accessory (31%; letter = 26) and you can fearful-avoidant accessory (twenty eight.6%; n = 24), while you are for men, one particular represented adult attachment looks have been safe (38.5%; n = 20) and you may dismissing (36.5%; letter = 19). It is vital to focus on your possessed attachment design is defectively depicted inside men (step 3.8%; letter = 2), representing 14.3% of our take to (Letter = 12).
An initial MANOVA, using the Wilk’s test (Rao’s approximation), was performed with the raw scores of the attachment (adult attachment style-secure, dismissing, anxious-preoccupied, and fearful-avoidant) as the dependent variables and with gender, education, and current family situation, as well as their interactions, as the explanatory variables. Education [F(4, 118) = 3.236, p = 0.015], current family situation [F(16, 321) = 1.704, p = 0.045), and the interaction between gender and education [F(several, 271) = 2.115, p = 0.016] were found to significantly influence the attachment scores for participants.
A few you to definitely-method ANOVAs was completed to observe the dating between the created changeable raw an incredible number of this new accessory looks additionally the explanatory details out of degree and you can most recent loved ones condition, and communications between the two. Whenever you are nothing of these serwis randkowy sugardaddie Aeters were discovered to be high. The outcomes reveal, for example, you to definitely players who’d a highschool studies was indeed on the a reduction of stressed-preoccupied connection style, and is associated with the an increase as it interacts that have all of the loved ones points, plus the finest boost was utilized in the individuals participants with an effective senior high school education and are usually hitched.
The significant associations between attachment styles were examined further by non-parametric testing (i.e., Kruskal–Wallis test) using a Monte Carlo method with 10,000 simulations and p < 0.05. The findings revealed several significant relationships between attachment scores (K = , p < 0.0001). The Steel–Dwass–Critchlow-Fligner procedure for multiple comparisons revealed that scores for the anxious-preoccupied attachment style were significantly different from the other attachment styles (see Figure 1).
Removed along with her, towards the raw ratings for the adult attachment looks, this new raw score to own nervous-obsessed attachment styles generally vary from those individuals to the almost every other accessory styles. A following analysis is actually hence developed to decide and this of the explanatory variables, or no, inspired these types of brutal score into the nervous-preoccupied attachment looks.
An ANOVA was therefore performed to determine the relationship between the explanatory variables of gender, education, and current family situation and the anxious-preoccupied attachment scores. The overall model was significant [F(8, 122) = 2.193, p = 0.032], and only gender was found to significantly influence anxious-preoccupied attachment scores [F(1, 129) = 6.176, p = 0.014]. The post-hoc comparisons using the Tukey’s honestly significant difference test indicated that the mean score for females (Mfemale = 3.325, SD = 0.374) was significantly different from the mean score for males (Mmale = 2.625, SD = 0.363). Taken together, these results indicate that women have higher levels of anxious-preoccupied scores for attachment compared with men.
Study of the Relationship Anywhere between Dysfunctional Behaviors, Accessory Appearances, and Market Variables
Once the found within the Dining table step 3, the preferred dysfunctional practices accompanied were communication (Letter = 102), followed closely by giving question (N = 37) and you will handling habits (letter = 25). Contained in this low-scientific test, most other much more serious dysfunctional behavior integrated seven threats, around three wounds, you to property wreck, and no hostility.
Afraid and you will obsessed players was discovered to be overrepresented for correspondence and defamation, respectively. All in all, 91.2% (Letter = 31) of scared members put interaction as their impaired behavior [? ( step three ) dos = eight.98, p = 0.046, V = 0.25], if you find yourself 30% (Letter = 5) from preoccupied members made use of defamation because their impaired behavior [? ( 3 ) dos = six.25, p = 0.019, V = 0.22]. Regarding seeking to assist, obsessed participants be seemingly prone to look for elite group let, when you’re nothing of one’s dismissing participants declared to inquire of for help [? ( step 3 ) 2 = 8.21, p = 0.042, V = 0.28].