On consequence of this research, some tips can be made for further methods associated with dispute resolution. For the associated literature, essentially societal expertise studies (Openshaw, Mills, Adams, Durso, 1992), interaction and you can troubleshooting studies (Clarke Greenberg, 1986; DeForest Hugles, 1992; Enough time Adams, 2001) and you will behavioural approach (Robin, Patrica, Moye, 1995; Energy, 1992) were used in education out-of disagreement solution. Yet not, cognitive behavioral therapy was great at ent away from dispute quality experience (Hoyer, Fecht, Louterback Schneider, 2001; Spillane-Grieco, 2000). Which effort adds that individuals can buy a whole lot more fulfillment using their interactions.

There are several restrictions and this determine generalization of these overall performance. Basic, the study was limited amount of new member and you can test try recruited away from university students. Hence, brand new samplecan not be depict the adolescent. Second, parents-teens interactions was examined that with notice-statement tips and you may anly off adolescents’ perspective. This strategies offers limited information regarding relations. 3rd, individuals’ perception throughout the relatives try tested certain duration of interaction, maybe not along the several months.

Future degree could well be simulate the present research also take to regarding folks of some ages and you will neighborhood. Morever, moms and dads teens relationships is analyzed playing with different ways instance videotaped or head observation. Observational training you can expect to promote more information about especially family and you will parents’ perception in the relatives is regarded as in subsequent degree. This study are going to be constant in a number of times within the a longitudinal data that may bring more sensible results.

Addis, J. Bernard, Yards. E. (2002). Relationship variations and you can unreasonable viewpoints. Log out of Rational-emotive and Intellectual Behavioral Medication, 20, 3-thirteen.

Akbalik, G. (2001). Catiflma cozme olce inin gecerlik ve guvenirlik calismas>. (the research from authenticity away from precision out of Disagreement Resolution Measure). Turk Psikolojik Dan>flma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, sixteen,7-13

Clark, K. Greenberg, L. S. (1986). Differential ramifications of gestalt a couple of-chair intervention and troubleshooting in the fixing desicional disagreement. Diary of Guidance Therapy, 33,11-15.

Next emotional input predicated on cognitive choices principle would be applied to individuals to become awareness of their having impaired dating opinions as well as side effects on the dispute quality process and alter its impaired thinking

Cramer, D. (2004). Effect of new malicious beliefs disgareement philosophy toward matchmaking satisfaction having aromantic spouse or best friend. Psychology and you may Therapy, 77, 121-133.

Debord, J., Romans, S. C., Krieshok, T. (1996). Forecasts dyadic variations regarding general and you may dating particular philosophy. Log from Psychology, 130, 263-280.

DeForest, P. Hughes, J.(1992). Treatment of mother or father-adolescent disagreement by way of behavioural techonology degree: case study. Log away from Informative Psychological Session, 3,281-301.

DiGuiseppe, R. Zee, C. (1986). A rational emotive idea regarding relationship breakdown and you will marital medication. Record off Rational-emotive and you can Intellectual Behavioral Medication, cuatro, 22-37.

Impractical opinions of logical lovers: Their link to traditional, wants and you will fulfillment

Eidelson, R. J. Epstein, N. (1982). Knowledge and you can relationships maladjustment: Growth of a measure of impaired relationships viewpoints. Journal out of Asking and you can Systematic Psychology, fifty, 715-720.

Emmelkamp, P. G., Krol, B., Sanderman, Roentgen., Ruphan, Yards. (1987). The review from matchmaking philosophy for the marital perspective. Identity and Individual Differences, 8, 775-780.

Epstein, Letter., Baucom., D. H., Rankin, L. A great. (1993). Therapy of marital dispute: an intellectual behavioral means. Systematic Mindset Comment, 13, 45-57.

Epstein, N., Finnegan, B. Bythell, D. (1979). Unreasonable opinions and you may impression out of relationship conflict. Log of Consulting and you can Scientific Therapy, 47, 608-610.

Epstein, Letter., Pretzer, J. L. Fleming, B. (1987). The newest part away from intellectual assessment for the worry about-records of marital interaction. Decisions Medication, 18, 51-69.

Eryuksel, A beneficial. (1996). Anne baba ve ergen iliflkilerinin disease cozme iletiflim becerileri biliflsel carptmalar ve aile yaps acsndan incelenmesi.(The study away from family relations https://datingranking.net/nl/imeetzu-overzicht/ relatives with regards to problem solving, correspondence experiences, intellectual distortion and you can family members framework). Yaynlanmamls Doktora Tezi. (Unpublished master thesis) Ege Univeristesi.