Deuteronomy 22:21 chances are they shall draw out the damsel into door of the lady dad’s home
Judges 19:2 And his concubine starred the whore against him, and moved away from your unto her father’s house to Bethlehemjudah, and is truth be told there four entire several months.
Jeremiah 3:12-14,22 Go and proclaim these statement toward the north, and say, Come Back, thou backsliding Israel, saith the father; and I also won’t result in mine fury to fall upon your: for I Will Be merciful, saith the LORD, and I will likely not keep frustration for everaˆ¦
Jeremiah 4:1,14 If thou wilt return, O Israel, saith the LORD, return unto me: while thou wilt set aside thine abominations regarding my personal look, subsequently shalt thou perhaps not removeaˆ¦
Jeremiah 8:4-6 Moreover thou shalt state unto all of them, therefore saith god
They claim. –Better, as we say, as launching an innovative new applying of the figure. The immediate resource is Deuteronomy 24:4, which forbade the return to days gone by spouse as an abomination, a laws that your present discovery of this Book with the Law (2Kings 22:10-11) have probably put into importance. But there is however additionally a clear allusion with the want imagery in Hosea. There the prophet had completed, literally or even in parable, what the laws got prohibited (Hosea 2:16; Hosea 3:3), therefore have held out the chance for return in addition to hope of pardon. Jeremiah must perform a sterner part. and result in the apostate adulteress at least think she got sinned as well significantly for any claims to forgiveness. This may look as if Jehovah would never today come back to the passion for His espousals, while making their what she once had been.
But go back once again to me, saith the father. –The phrase sounds within the English like a gracious invitation, and–in spite with the expert many interpreters who take it as an indignant exclamation, and go back to myself! an invitation considering in paradox, so equal to rejection, as if that return happened to be out of the question–it must, i believe, getting very used. The prophet provides, even as we have observed, the real history of Hosea in his mind’s eye, in which there had been these a call to return (Hosea 2:19; Hosea 3:3), and in actual fact describes it and repeats they in Jeremiah 3:7; Jeremiah 3:12; Jeremiah 3:14. It surely suggests a want of insight into the smoothness of Jeremiah to guess that the guy previously emerged before men as proclaiming an irrevocable condemnation, leaving out the possibility of repentance.
Verse 1. – They say , etc.; just like the margin of Authorized adaptation precisely states, the Hebrew simply enjoys “claiming.” Various ingenious efforts have been made to describe this. Hitzig, as an example, accompanied by Dr. Payne Smith, thinks that “saying” is likely to be a silly counterpart for “that is to say,” “eg,” or even the similar; while the Vulgate and Rashi, followed closely by De Wette and RosenmA?ller, assume an ellipsis, and render, “really frequently stated,” or “i would state.” But much one particular normal way is to suppose that “claiming” try a fragment on the superscription from the prophecy, the remaining that has-been inadvertently positioned in ver. 6, and that we should browse, “additionally the word of the father emerged unto myself for the times of Josiah the master, stating.” Therefore J. D. Michaelis, Ewald, Graf, Naegelsbach. If a man set aside their girlfriend . The discussion was founded throughout the laws of Deuteronomy 24:1-4, which forbade an Israelite who had divorced their girlfriend to take their once again, if from inside the interval she was married to some other. The Jews have damaged a still a lot more sacred link, not as soon as only, but over repeatedly; they worshipped “gods most and lords lots of;” so that they didn’t come with lengthier any declare on Jehovah in virtue of their “covenant” along with his individuals. Shall he come back , etc.? rather, Ought he to go back? The power in the name are possible (comp. Authorized form of Genesis 34:7, “which thing ought to not be performed”). Shall perhaps not within the next clause is quite wouldn’t . However go back again for me. Thus Peshito, Targum, Vulgate, together with see could seem to-be verified by invites in vers. 12, 14, 22. But as it’s obviously inconsistent because of the debate on the verse, and also as the verb may just as very well be the infinitive and/or vital, most recent commentators give, “And thinkest thou to go back in my experience?” (virtually, and time for me personally! implying your really concept are inconceivable). Probably Jeremiah was actually aware a number of the Jews were dissatisfied using spiritual disease in the nation (compensation. ver. 4) hoe te zien wie je leuk vindt op biggercity zonder te betalen.