Downey v. Instaloans Financial Systems Centres McLennan Ross acted for the Defendants in this course action commenced in Ontario against a loan that is payday, that was solved included in the general settlement regarding the Ontario and Alberta course procedures against our consumers. The settlement agreements had been authorized by the Courts in Ontario and Alberta.
Fong et al v. Calgary that is grenville-Germain Limited McLennan Ross acted when it comes to directors of a business which constructed an extra condominium/hotel/office complex in a action commenced with respect to the people who own the domestic condominiums for misrepresentations and inadequacies.
Hudyma v. LoyaltyOne, Inc. et al McLennan Ross acted for the transportation that is international pertaining to an action involving a big travel facilitator in addition to incorporation of gas surcharges when you look at the calculation of expenses.
Kilroy v. A payday that is ok loans et al it was A uk Columbia course action against a quantity of cash advance operations, for which McLennan Ross represented three regarding the Defendants. The Plaintiff discontinued its action against our consumers.
Korte v. Cormie McLennan Ross ended up being counsel towards the auditors in this step, a proceeding that is“representative ahead of the utilization of course procedures legislation in Alberta, that has been brought with respect to most of the investors in 2 subsidiaries for the Principal Group, a monetary conglomerate that failed. The problem ended up being settled ahead of exams for finding.
Lahaie v. Goodyear it was a course action against Goodyear
McLennan Ross assisted as Alberta counsel in commencing the course action in Alberta during the request of British Columbia counsel, that has currently commenced an action in British Columbia. The situation had been settled in British Columbia.
MacKinnon v. National cash Mart et al This course action had been brought in British Columbia up against the major operators when you look at the loan industry that is payday. McLennan Ross had been counsel to at least one associated with the Defendants. We had been effective in opposing a credit card applicatoin for official certification, following that the Plaintiff discontinued this step as against our consumers.
Nette v. Stiles et al In this class that is proposed, the Plaintiff advertised from the Alberta national in addition to College of Chiropractors that particular therapy ended up being harmful and may never be allowed within the Province of Alberta. McLennan Ross represented a Defendant and brought a credit card applicatoin to truly have the claim dismissed just before certification. The Plaintiff discontinued against our customer ahead of the application had been argued.
O’Keefe v. Menu Foods working Limited Partnership McLennan Ross ended up being involved with a course action brought by owners alleging any particular one for the major suppliers of pet meals in Alberta didn’t have quality settings in position which led to the loss of home animals from tainted meals. This litigation had been solved by settlement among the events.
Pauli et al v. Ace INA Insurance et al McLennan Ross acted as Alberta counsel for just one of this Defendants in this course of action which desired an interpretation regarding the Insurance Act and a return of every deductible charged where there clearly was a loss that is total of at issue. The action had been settled in preference of the Defendants after a synopsis dedication of a point of legislation.
Ramias v. Johnson McLennan Ross ended up being counsel to your Plaintiffs in this putative course action which reported investment fraudulence and securities violations. It had been discontinued after settlement with all the Defendants.
Tschritter v. Instaloans Financial Systems Centres McLennan Ross ended up being counsel into the Defendants in this class action brought against a loan that is payday in the Province of Alberta, which was settled within the overall settlement of this Ontario and Alberta course procedures against our consumers (see Bruley and Downey above).
Western Canada Buying Centres v. Dutton McLennan Ross acted for starters regarding the defendants in this longstanding course action for many years.
1023926 Alberta Ltd. v. Bank of America et al Class actions have now been filed against Visa, MasterCard, and an amount of banking institutions in British Columbia, Alberta, Quebec and Ontario, claiming losings on the part of Canadian merchants who accepted re re re payment for items or solutions by means of Visa or MasterCard charge cards pertaining to solution charges and limitations on company methods which were needed so that you can accept payments that are such payday loans in California. McLennan Ross will act as Alberta representative for counsel for starters of this Defendant institutions that are financial. The issues are at the mercy of coordinated instance administration and they are ongoing.
Alexander and Barrett v. HMS Financial et al McLennan Ross is co-counsel for the Plaintiffs with regards to a nationwide and class that is cross-border alleging securities fraudulence. This course of action ended up being certified as against many specific and business Defendants, including major banking institutions. We now have restored a few million bucks for the course users.
Bird v. Blott & Associates et al McLennan Ross is representing among the Defendants in this proposed course action on the behalf of a wide range of domestic college claimants. We now have simply filed a declaration of Defence and also the action have not yet been certified.
Covidien LLC McLennan Ross is representing Covidien LLC in 2 course actions brought by people who had mesh that is urinary. Covidien is certainly one supplier (amongst many named manufacturers and suppliers) of the item in Canada. The litigation mirrors comparable class actions brought in the usa.
L’Hirondelle v Medicentres An $11 million course action lawsuit is filed over a laptop that is missing individual and wellness information of 620,000 Albertans. The lawsuit alleges Medicentres neglected to protect personal information and ended up being negligent in using a lot more than four months to see the general public concerning the privacy breach. McLennan Ross is counsel into the IT consulting firm, whom employed the IT consultant who owned the missing laptop computer.
Phillips and Wournell v. Image (Topco) companies Limited et al This proposed class proceeding in British Columbia, associated with the Tracy action below, is brought against people and entities alleging conveyance that is fraudulent of regarding the the ongoing Tracy payday loans course proceeding. Defence with this action is ongoing.
Poseidon Concepts Corp. McLennan Ross is lead counsel to your auditors of Poseidon Concepts Corp. (Poseidon) in a shareholder course action claim in Alberta for $650 million, in addition to associated actions filed in Alberta, Ontario, Quebec, and nyc. The events mixed up in different disputes, as well as the Plaintiff investors, consist of: Poseidon through its Monitor, Underwriters, a Lending Syndicate of chartered banking institutions, a predecessor general public firm, and also the directors and officers of Poseidon.
Tracy v. Instaloans Financial Solution Centres McLennan Ross is counsel to your Defendants in course action procedures within the Province of British Columbia. The course action alleges that the Defendant payday loan providers had been operated unlawfully and claims damages into the tens of huge amount of money. Defence for the proceeding continues subsequent to its official official certification as a course action.